Eugenics At Its Best…Or Worst.

“A paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics argues that abortion should be extended to make the killing of newborn babies permissible, even if the baby is perfectly healthy, in a shocking example of how the medical establishment is still dominated by a eugenicist mindset…The authors argue that ‘both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons,’ and that because abortion is allowed even when there is no problem with the fetus’ health, ‘killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled…Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life.'” (Click here to read more about the paper, and here to read the actual paper itself ).


What’s next? We’re only human if we’re over 18 or 21? And once we are older than 50, well, we cease to be human again? Who says when a newborn starts to have the “same moral status as actual persons?” Who’s deciding the legal age at which an infant becomes a human? And when (not if) they take this to the next step, who’s deciding when a person becomes too old to count as human anymore, and can be legally killed?

I hope this makes whoever reads it as angry as it’s making me. If you can find a way for a powerless 17-year-old girl living in Middle Of Nowhere, Vermont to protest this, please let me know.


4 Comments Add yours

  1. ashleytm says:

    ;) Good Job Anna


  2. Luke says:

    Hire a hitman, thats the best we can do right now…They say Walker County Alabama is the best place to hire one…
    But yeah its really really maddening, oh and Ashley. Its really awkward to ‘like’ the post o_o


    1. ashleytm says:

      *shrug* I like that fact that she is posting this and that she has her head screwed on right about this topic.
      lol you’re awkward.


  3. Jonathan says:

    Hi Anna, Shanda let me know that you have a blog, you have a new follower!

    If there is any encouragement from this horrifying journal article, it’s that ironically this may actually accelerate the pro-life movement. This article exposes the grim reality that killing a healthy fetus in the womb is really not much different from killing a healthy new-born baby. If the two are equivocal, people morally outraged from this article, by logic, must extend their outrage towards abortion. Also, I just tried to download the actual article from the Journal of Medical Ethics, and it does not seem to be available, perhaps people are so outraged that they have already taken it down?!



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s